Local Plan Main Modifications Consultation

Closes 24 Apr 2026

Policy SP6: Land at former Chuter Ede Education Centre

Main Modification Reference MM-06

Local Plan page number Policy or paragraph Local Plan Proposed Change Justification
44 SP6: Criterion 2

2. The loss of playing field land shall be mitigated [removed] replaced [added] in accordance with an agreed mitigation strategy and contributions sought for the enhancement of playing pitches and facilities on playing field land to the south of Chuter Ede. 

Consistency with national policy
44 SP6: Criterion 5

Proposals must be supported by a site-specific transport assessment, with particular focus on Benton Road, Galsworthy Road, Boldon Lane, New Road and the Tileshed and [added] Boldon Level Crossings [added] along with the importance of active travel links and public transport connections. 

Effective
45 SP6: Paragraph 5.13

Playing field land which is lost to development should be fully replaced through an agreed mitigation strategy and informed by the most up to date Playing Pitch Strategy and discussions with Sport England. The Council has identified land at Temple Park Junior School, as identified in Policy SP23 (5, iii), as the primary site for playing field mitigation lost due to development of this site.  [added]

Contributions will also [added] be sought to support the  [added] enhancement of retained  [added] playing field land and facilities on [added] land to the [added] south of Chuter Ede. 

Effective

 

What to consider when making a representation

What are the tests of soundness and legal compliance?  

The purpose of the examination is to consider whether the local plan complies with relevant legal requirements for producing local plans, including the duty to cooperate, and meets the national tests of ‘soundness’ for local plans set out in the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).

Therefore, representations submitted at this stage must only be made on these grounds and, where relevant, be supported with evidence to demonstrate why these tests have not been met.

Legal compliance

To be legally compliant the plan has to be prepared in accordance with the duty to cooperate and legal and procedural requirements, including the 2011 Localism Act and Town and County Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012 (as amended).

Soundness

The inspector conducting the examination in public has to be satisfied that the local plan is ‘sound’; namely that it is:

• Positively prepared – the plan should be prepared based on a strategy which seeks to meet objectively assessed development and infrastructure requirements, including unmet requirements from neighbouring authorities where it is reasonable to do so and consistent with achieving sustainable development.

• Justified – the plan should be the most appropriate strategy, when considered against the reasonable alternatives, based on proportionate evidence.

• Effective – the plan should be deliverable over its period and based on effective joint working on cross-boundary strategic priorities, and

• Consistent with national policy – the plan should enable the delivery of sustainable development in accordance with the policies in the NPPF.

26. Does this modification make the Plan legally compliant?
27. Does this modification make the Plan sound?
28. If you think it is not sound tell us which test(s) it fails.
29. Please provide a justification for your responses. If you need to submit material in PDF format then please email this to local.plan@southtyneside.gov.uk making sure your name is clearly stated.
30. What appropriate change is needed? If you think the wording should be different set out the precise change you want the Inspector to recommend.