Infrastructure Delivery Plan update

Page 1 of 4

Closes 24 Apr 2026

Infrastructure Delivery Plan update

Clicking here will open the Infrastructure Delivery Plan update in a new window.

In your response, please be clear which changes you are responding to.

You will need to complete the 'Your Personal Details' section before you can submit your comments.

Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)

There is an increasing potential for the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to generate written material.  The Planning Inspectorate has recently published guidance on the use of AI: www.gov.uk/guidance/use-of-artificial-intelligence-in-casework-evidence (opens in new window)

Representations on the proposed main modifications that do not follow the advice on the use of AI are at risk of not being accepted.

1. Do you have any comments to make relating to the Infrastructure Delivery Plan update?

What to consider when making a representation

What are the tests of soundness and legal compliance?  

The purpose of the examination is to consider whether the local plan complies with relevant legal requirements for producing local plans, including the duty to cooperate, and meets the national tests of ‘soundness’ for local plans set out in the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).

Therefore, representations submitted at this stage must only be made on these grounds and, where relevant, be supported with evidence to demonstrate why these tests have not been met.

Legal compliance

To be legally compliant the plan has to be prepared in accordance with the duty to cooperate and legal and procedural requirements, including the 2011 Localism Act and Town and County Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012 (as amended).

Soundness

The inspector conducting the examination in public has to be satisfied that the local plan is ‘sound’; namely that it is:

• Positively prepared – the plan should be prepared based on a strategy which seeks to meet objectively assessed development and infrastructure requirements, including unmet requirements from neighbouring authorities where it is reasonable to do so and consistent with achieving sustainable development.

• Justified – the plan should be the most appropriate strategy, when considered against the reasonable alternatives, based on proportionate evidence.

• Effective – the plan should be deliverable over its period and based on effective joint working on cross-boundary strategic priorities, and

• Consistent with national policy – the plan should enable the delivery of sustainable development in accordance with the policies in the NPPF.